|
|
Plenary Sessions
| |
Plenary Session 1 |
| |
|
| |
Plenary Session 2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
KEYNOTE ADDRESS
Innovating with Technology: The challenge
to education policy, leadership, and management
by Gerry White
The promise of information and communication technologies (ICTs)
has brought with it a breakthrough in communications
capabilities and the ability to share information. These
capabilities are paramount for education and can help to improve
learning outcomes for reduced costs while at the same time
increasing educational services.
However, the response by education authorities to harness ICTs
needs to be both strategic and collaborative at national,
regional, and local levels. Countries that do harness the use of
ICTs in education will clearly benefit both economically and
socially in the knowledge society.
This paper focuses on why ICTs are so important to education,
with strong support needed from national, regional, and local
education authorities. It outlines the conditions that are
needed to implement ICTs successfully, such as flexibility, a
shared vision, and collaboration at a variety of levels.
A number of examples of good practice using ICTs are
demonstrated, including Education Network Australia’s online
service EdNA (www.edna.edu.au), learning objects from The
Learning Federation (www.thelearningfederation.edu.au), new and
emerging services such as HotMaths (http://www.hotmaths.com),
and career planning and exploration services for students such
as myfuture (www.myfuture.edu.au).
A brief overview of the technologies available, including
emerging technologies, and the methods for implementing ICTs in
classrooms to improve learning outcomes are discussed.
Finally, a word of caution is sounded that ICTs need to operate
in an open and collaborative environment for education to be
advantaged. There is a need for open technical standards, open
content, open services, and open networks in education for the
advantages to be fully realized.
|
|
| |
|
|
Championing Philippine ICT
by
Ramon P. Sales
Information and communications technology (ICT) has been a
widely utilized tool by many governments for greater efficiency,
transparency, and governance. The Philippine Government itself
aspires to capitalize on said resource towards achieving a
“people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented Information
Society” where peoples and communities have access to
information and knowledge.
With the creation of the Commission on Information and
Communications Technology (CICT), the Arroyo Administration
further emphasizes that ICT provides vast socio-economic
opportunities that need to be optimized through more substantive
and extensive public-private sector collaborations. The need for
an ICT Roadmap becomes more pronounced—it lays down strategies
and programs that reflect Government’s commitment to develop a
world-class ICT sector. As a result of consultations with
stakeholders, the ICT Roadmap recognizes the urgency of creating
the Department of ICT and the passage of ICT-related laws such
as those governing cybercrimes, data security and privacy, and
convergence. It also provides for CICT’s programs, which are
centered on the following strategies:
Ensure universal access to ICT. Citizens, especially the
marginalized sectors and underserved areas, shall be accorded
access to basic government services, information, and quality
education. The Community e-Center Program, the Internet in
Schools (iSchools) project, and PC ng Bayan are only some of the
CICT initiatives serving this purpose.
Develop human capital for sustainable development. CICT’s ICT
Competency and Standards Development Program ensures that our
teachers, civil servants, and ICT professionals are further
skilled to be competitive globally. The ICT for Education
(ICT4E) Program aims to incorporate ICT in learning. Worthwhile
endeavors, such as eSkwela, aim to benefit out-of-school youth
by giving them ICT-enhanced alternative education opportunities.
ICT for e-governance. The eGovernment Fund continues to provide
funding to frontline ICT projects that are citizen-centric,
mission-critical, and cross-agency. Common applications for
National Government Agencies are to be developed towards
integrating processes and systems. This IP-based government
network will not only provide data communications but also VOIP
services to Government.
Enhance competitiveness globally.
The Cyberservices Corridor (CySCor) as a CICT flagship program
envisions competent human capital and enabling infrastructure to
meet the IT-enabled service requirements of investors from north
to south of the country.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Defining a Philippine Master Plan for ICT in Basic Education
by
Jesli A. Lapus
In an era where knowledge has become
the basis of prosperity and competitiveness in a global economy,
primacy is placed on accessible quality basic education. This is
because the competitiveness of the nation and its people is
achieved when its citizens can actively participate in national
development and claim opportunities to improve their quality of
life.
Since education is one of the sectors critical to spurring the
country’s sustainable development, it has no other alternative
but to capitalize on the opportunities offered by information
and communication technology (ICT) in a world that is
increasingly dependent on the ability of individuals to
transform information into knowledge and to apply that knowledge
in dynamic, cross-cultural contexts.
For the past ten years, the basic education sub-sector has taken
up the challenge of evolving learning environments where
resources are accessed through ICT. Several ICT for education
initiatives are now being implemented with the aim of enhancing
the teaching-learning process. These initiatives, involving a
broad range of stakeholders from government, civil society, and
the private sector, have resulted in improved access to
technology in schools and have fostered experimentation and to
some extent, model-building in technology-curriculum
integration.
However, much work still has to be done to fully exploit the
potentials of ICT in basic education. This paper presents the
Department of Education’s framework and agenda for ICT in Basic
Education, articulating goals, strategies and targets for the
next five years.
|
 |
|
| |
|
| |
ICT in
Education Policies That Make Sense
by
Benjamin L. Vergel de Dios
UNESCO’s ICT in Education Policy
project aims to build national capacities by helping
policymakers and educational planners develop appropriate ICT in
Education policies and plans. This paper articulates the core
messages of UNESCO in relation to educational technology use: 1)
information and communications technology (ICT) does not only
mean computers and the Internet but includes telephony,
broadcast radio and television, and playback technologies as
well; and 2) technology is merely a tool for achieving education
objectives. This paper argues that the use of ICT makes sense
only if it promotes greater access to education and enhances
teaching efficiency, if it is affordable, and if the use of the
technology is already widespread. It concludes with some
suggestions for improving ICT policy development in the region.
|
| |
|
| |
Co-Creating a Compelling Future for Schools in Southeast Asia
by
Erlinda C. Pefianco |
| |
|
Sustainability and Strategic Partnerships in ICT4E
by
Tim Unwin
This presentation addresses three
core themes: theoretical considerations of the connections
between sustainability and partnership; a review of existing
frameworks for sustainability and partnership; and an
alternative framework for considering the implementation of
ICT4E partnerships. It begins by exploring why the concepts of
“partnership” and “sustainability” have become so popular in
contemporary development practice, and suggests that this
reflects key interests involved in promulgating such ideas. Five
diverse examples of ICT4E partnerships are then briefly
summarized: The Global Knowledge Partnership (GKP), the Jordan
Education Initiative (JEI), the Global Schools and Communities
Initiative (GeSCI), the Information Society Partnership for
Africa’s Development (ISPAD), and India’s Mission 2007.
Five dimensions of sustainability in ICT4E programs are often
defined: educational, technological, social, political, and
economic or financial. However, such a framework omits key
dimensions such as environmental and cultural sustainability,
and largely reflects an economic and accountancy framework.
Within this, total cost of ownership principles have often been
seen as being particularly important. The GeSCI model is
explored in some depth to illustrate these ideas.
An alternative framework for considering sustainable ICT4E
partnerships, published by UNESCO for the World Summit on the
Information Society in 2005, is then presented. This framework
examines three elements: the needs for successful partnerships,
the importance of recognizing both demand and supply partners,
and the distinction between benefits from and contributions to
partnerships.
This presentation concludes with a review of the key principles
of successful and sustainable ICT4E partnerships and of some
challenges for the future.
Download PowerPoint Show
|
| |
|
How Do We Know It’s Working? Evaluation to create effective
professional development programs in ICT4E
by
Daniel Light
Governments and educational leaders
face increasing challenges as they seek to transform their
education systems to teach the new skills requirements of the
21st century and improve the overall quality of education.
Evaluation and research on current and future programs and
policies are fundamental to the successful transformation of our
education systems.
This presentation describes the role
evaluation research plays in advancing the effective use of
educational technologies in education systems around the world.
It argues that effective evaluation produces research-based
knowledge of what technological applications work best in
various educational environments, and practice-based knowledge
of how the technology integration process is best designed to
meet locally defined learning goals in education systems and
schools.
Using the experience of the Intel® Teach to the Future programs,
this talk touches on some of the relevant policy areas that the
Intel® Teach evaluations suggest are crucial conditions for the
success of information and communication technology (ICT)-focused
professional development. The evaluation data identify three
important areas where teachers will need support in order to
effectively integrate ICT to create innovative, project-based
learning environments: infrastructure, national curriculum, and
institutionalization of a new culture of teaching. In relation
to infrastructure concerns, for example, the data point to
aspects of distribution and access that may facilitate teachers’
use of ICT with students, and for their own planning and
preparation. There are also interesting and challenging ways in
which teachers perceive conflicts between the new ICT activities
and their required curriculum that often prove to be impediments
to changing teacher practice. This finding is closely connected
with the challenges many leaders face in trying to
institutionalize new pedagogical practices and a new culture of
teaching in classrooms. Program evaluations have been able to
reveal some of these challenges, and identify solutions.
This presentation is informed by the rich 25-year history of the
Education Development Center (EDC). Aside from being a part of
Intel® Education’s external evaluation team for the past eight
years, EDC has collaborated in U.S. and international ICT4E
projects with USAID, the World Bank, the Inter-American
Development Bank, and the International Development Research
Centre-Canada, as well as many U.S.-based foundations and
corporations.
|
 |
|
| |
|
Copyright © 2006 Foundation for Information Technology Education and Development, Inc (FIT-ED). |
| |
| This website contains abstracts of all paper presentations and demonstrations, and the full papers and slide presentations submitted to the Congress organizers by 7 September 2006. Copyright to individual papers and presentations belongs to their respective authors. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these papers and presentations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Congress organizers. |
|